The maritime demarcation file continues to be a significant topic of discussion, awaiting the Israeli response to the American paper during today's Israeli ministerial meeting. Sources monitoring this file noted a significant question mark surrounding the strong Israeli opposition to the agreement, particularly from Benjamin Netanyahu. However, despite this opposition, indicators suggest that matters are leaning towards signing the agreement and accepting the American proposal. The concern remains that if the Israeli government approves the agreement, and Netanyahu wins and leads the new government, he may distance himself from it.
Thus, sources argue that to avoid falling into such pitfalls, every international treaty should be voted on in parliament to prevent governments from reneging on them. Consequently, if the Knesset votes on the demarcation agreement, there would be a greater guarantee regarding the future of the agreement.
In Israel, this is the situation, while in Lebanon, the context is different according to the sources. There is no fear of its approval due to a supporting majority, but there are concerns about corruption. This issue can only be addressed through a sovereign fund proposed by Progressive Socialist Party leader Walid Jumblatt; otherwise, there will be open theft. Additionally, there is a question regarding whether this treaty should be subjected to a vote in the House of Representatives.
Despite the legitimate questions, the atmosphere is not bleak, and all matters are expected to be streamlined for signing in both form and content. However, the main challenge lies in what steps Lebanon will take after signing to preserve and protect its national wealth.
