Investigations into the cyber breach at Rafic Hariri International Airport remain open to various possibilities. According to sources cited by "Al-Markazia," the most logical hypothesis suggests that the information was obscured from all monitored devices. The report indicated that claiming the aim of the breach was to facilitate a deal or allow certain "security or political" figures into Lebanese territory does not align with the reality at the airport. It is widely known that a single party holds control over the airport and the country, enabling them to allow anyone or anything into Lebanon through Beirut International Airport without going through public security or oversight.
The report continued: "With this prevalent hypothesis dismissed, it still seems likely that a sabotage operation occurred, the purpose of which remains unclear. It should be revealed, along with the entity responsible for the breach, within 24 hours; only then can we speculate on the motive. However, if the outcome is either 'we found nothing or we know but do not wish to disclose any information,' it implies that the responsible party is protected. Who knows the identity of the protected or armed entity in this country?"
The agency added: "What happened at Rafic Hariri International Airport has reignited calls, with significant urgency, for the operationalization of Qlay'at Airport, which is equipped to serve as a civilian airport. It is unacceptable for Beirut Airport to remain the only air entry point in the country, a situation that is not found in any other country in the world except Lebanon."
